 fao producers & admin |
@1$-)
unregistered
 |
|
how about seperating the producers into sections according to their status. so 'master producers' 'cool producers' etc etc are seperated into their own sections when they upload. and downloaders will have an initial idea of the quality of what their about to get.
just a thought anyway
|
|
|
30-09-2006 19:31 |
|
|
Friscko 
Aron Tinnitus
Registration Date: 12-03-2005
Posts: 4,467
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
|
|
30-09-2006 19:41 |
|
|
cynik
Cp6uja
Registration Date: 15-03-2005
Posts: 5,646
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Friscko
then the noobs are gonna get a lot less reviews, and that's what it's all about right? help out eachother, without looking at their production expierience? 
|
no I got another idea
how about at the end of the month tunes with less than 3 stars get deleted? that should keep quality up and boost less skilled to produce better tracks
__
https://soundcloud.com/tsai-vidro-voves
|
|
|
30-09-2006 19:50 |
|
|
@1$-)
unregistered
|
|
|
well its the producers who do the reviews. so the only reason it would change is if people start ignoring the lower status sections. and lets face it most of the people that have been on here a while only review the other peeps that hav been on here a while anyway
|
|
|
30-09-2006 19:54 |
|
|
@1$-)
unregistered
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by cynik
| quote: |
Originally posted by Friscko
then the noobs are gonna get a lot less reviews, and that's what it's all about right? help out eachother, without looking at their production expierience?
|
no I got another idea
how about at the end of the month tunes with less than 3 stars get deleted? that should keep quality up and boost less skilled to produce better tracks |
yeh but the ratings on here are not always an indicator of quality anyway. sometimes but very rarely.
|
|
|
30-09-2006 19:57 |
|
|
cynik
Cp6uja
Registration Date: 15-03-2005
Posts: 5,646
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
|
|
30-09-2006 20:00 |
|
|
@1$-)
unregistered
|
|
|
|
30-09-2006 20:01 |
|
|
TechDiff
Hetty Jakes Pretentious Cheese Wog
Registration Date: 14-06-2005
Posts: 1,028
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by cynik
| quote: |
Originally posted by Friscko
then the noobs are gonna get a lot less reviews, and that's what it's all about right? help out eachother, without looking at their production expierience?
|
no I got another idea
how about at the end of the month tunes with less than 3 stars get deleted? that should keep quality up and boost less skilled to produce better tracks |
Um.... I dont think people need any sort of motivation to want to produce better tracks. It doesnt really seem like a good idea to me.
|
|
|
30-09-2006 21:00 |
|
|
equipped
tired
Registration Date: 20-05-2005
Posts: 3,818
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
yeah new rating system seem's to be doin the trick,..i vote every time now.
__
Space
|
|
|
30-09-2006 21:17 |
|
|
cynik
Cp6uja
Registration Date: 15-03-2005
Posts: 5,646
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by TechDiff
| quote: |
Originally posted by cynik
| quote: |
Originally posted by Friscko
then the noobs are gonna get a lot less reviews, and that's what it's all about right? help out eachother, without looking at their production expierience?
|
no I got another idea
how about at the end of the month tunes with less than 3 stars get deleted? that should keep quality up and boost less skilled to produce better tracks |
Um.... I dont think people need any sort of motivation to want to produce better tracks. It doesnt really seem like a good idea to me. |
yeah it is a bit faschist lol. I was in a strange mood when posting that
__
https://soundcloud.com/tsai-vidro-voves
|
|
|
30-09-2006 21:25 |
|
|
Greyone
Master Producer
Registration Date: 01-04-2005
Posts: 6,285
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
im for munki's idea...
3 Groups , so each catergory can check/vote eachoter but also others ...
and im also for a thing that the categories are not how-many-posts-have-you-made related ... it should be compared with the stars they get + posts + time on here + status
anyway im of partying now ... bye 
|
|
|
30-09-2006 22:06 |
|
|
Rudeone
love & light
Registration Date: 15-10-2005
Posts: 926
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
|
|
30-09-2006 22:43 |
|
|
djfreemc
Sponsor
Registration Date: 25-07-2003
Posts: 1,117
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by greyone
and im also for a thing that the categories are not how-many-posts-have-you-made related ... it should be compared with the stars they get + posts + time on here + status |
[offtopic] As for the people with producer rights i agree with this. For example: me. I have the master producer status but I rarely produce tracks and I only uploaded 1 track or something. I make a lot of posts throughout the entire forum and help where I can, but that doesn't reflect my producer experience. It doesn't seem fair that people with a lot more knowledge about producing than myself have lower rankings. But I think it would be a bitch to program someting like this into the board code. And the regular number of posts -based ranking is just in the basic forum code I think.
As for non-producers, I think the number of posts system isn't too bad. If someone is just new on the forum or has little interest in it, they will not have many posts, resulting in a low status, wich is logical. (Maybe average posts per day in the last year or something would be a better way of measuring, but anyway...). It's just the same as on any other forums, so I think most people will understand how it works.[/offtopic]
As for the tracks, I also think that dividing the tracks by the experience of the producers will result in less reviews for the less experienced producers, and that ain't no good. Perhaps dividing in not too detailed subgenres would be a better way to keep an overview of all the tracks. Or maybe allowing tagging of the tracks with subgenres, something like that...
__
The mysteries of the distorted snare...
Can't win if u don't play
This post has been edited 1 time(s), it was last edited by djfreemc: 01-10-2006 21:30.
|
|
|
01-10-2006 21:25 |
|
|
cynik
Cp6uja
Registration Date: 15-03-2005
Posts: 5,646
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
|
|
01-10-2006 22:35 |
|
|
vasquez
Tourist
Registration Date: 02-10-2006
Posts: 39
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
i would like to be a producer andi dont agree with this. no one would review me and i need the help
__
`°\\-WH0RE-//°´
|
|
|
02-10-2006 01:36 |
|
|
thechronic
admin
Registration Date: 01-11-2002
Posts: 5,293
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
Sorry for the late reply guys, I'm really busy 
To change the status in the forum is very difficult, the forum code is very large and very complex. It would take me days to figure it out, time I can better use to improve other parts of the site.
I could make some kind of producer rating, but not in the forum but in the producers page. When the voting system is finished I'm going to work on the producers page, it will contain functions to delete and rename your own tracks, and you will be able to make a page with your info and links to all your tracks.
This will not be for the near future though, I'm swamped with work again for the upcoming weeks, and the voting system will take a lot of time to finish off too. I'll keep you informed how things are progressing.
Offtopic: I'm now considering the streaming of tunes too, that is clearly a much requested feature! Again, this will take some time to get round to!
__
If you find spam on the site, please hit the  button and select my name. I'll personally kick it to the murky depths of hell where it belongs! 
|
|
|
02-10-2006 10:49 |
|
|
|
