what sample rate to use ?? |
alternate force
Cool Producer

Registration Date: 23-01-2009
Posts: 215
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
ez .. i was wondering what sample rate to use now im am using reason 5 with windows 7 .. does anyone know the best rate to use ??? as i`ve just got some dubstep signed and he said he wants them at 24 bit !!
__ http://www.myspace.com/dubkinetik

|
|
19-10-2010 15:49 |
|
|
Muad'Dib
Andrejnalin
   

Registration Date: 02-12-2003
Posts: 4,197
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
Sample rate where? While rendering? While mixing? Samplerate of samples?
__ Thinking about becoming an Image-Line/FL Studio customer? Want a 10% reduction in price? Use this affiliate link:
http://affiliate.image-line.com/BADEBDG473
There is no such thing without its opposite
-Bene Gesserit
|
|
19-10-2010 16:46 |
|
|
Puzzle
..zebra?
  

Registration Date: 27-05-2008
Posts: 724
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
When making tunes use the best quality samples you can find; preferably 16 or 24-bit wav.
When making tunes a 44100Hz mixer samplerate should be enough.
When rendering tunes 320 kb/s mp3 should be enough.
When you have to send a tune to a record label for release - 16 or 24-bit wav. Ask the label for details.
__ SoundCloud
Facebook
YouTube
|
|
19-10-2010 18:17 |
|
|
alternate force
Cool Producer

Registration Date: 23-01-2009
Posts: 215
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Muad'Dib
Sample rate where? While rendering? While mixing? Samplerate of samples?
|
yea both really .. if it will make a difference to my work both playing and when i want the finished product to be the best of the ability of the software i am using !!
__ http://www.myspace.com/dubkinetik

|
|
19-10-2010 19:22 |
|
|
BattleDrone
2161... the future.
   

Registration Date: 30-12-2005
Posts: 6,413
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Puzzle
When making tunes use the best quality samples you can find; preferably 16 or 24-bit wav.
When making tunes a 44100Hz mixer samplerate should be enough.
When rendering tunes 320 kb/s mp3 should be enough.
When you have to send a tune to a record label for release - 16 or 24-bit wav. Ask the label for details.
|
That...
If you use some mp3 samples or very low quality samples it will be clear to your audience that you made a mess of it.
If the label wants 24 bit, then give them 24 bit.
Not that it will lift your tune to unknown heights or anything.
__
Check my soundcloud (exclusive tracks on there)
|
|
19-10-2010 20:30 |
|
|
Crispy Liquids
Liquid Funkateer
 

Registration Date: 22-05-2005
Posts: 251
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
Usually it doesn't matter all that much, 192kps or 320kbps will probably only make minor difference in probably a minority of the cases. (Have you actually heard a difference when both qualities are mixed in your playlist?)
MP3 vs Wav, yeah, there is a difference; technically the content is indeed more complete than mp3, but yet again can you hear a difference? If you aren't going to be processing the file any more, then there is little reason to use the big-ass wav's; and even when you're selling mastering services I think 320kbps 32-bit floating point files will often be much more usefull than the wav files.
If it's a finished product, and you can't hear a difference, only logistics can still make a difference for me; that is, not having a huge-ass file without real benefits.
__ Crispy Liquids on Soundcloud Facebook Myspace
|
|
20-10-2010 13:10 |
|
|
Impact
Wicked Producer
 

Registration Date: 29-08-2010
Posts: 439
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
|
20-10-2010 13:19 |
|
|
Impact
Wicked Producer
 

Registration Date: 29-08-2010
Posts: 439
Helpfulness rating:
 |
|
|
20-10-2010 14:45 |
|
|
|