Question #025 (god) |
Greyone
Master Producer
Registration Date: 01-04-2005
Posts: 6,285
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Muad'Dib
quote: |
Originally posted by Saikonutta
quote: |
Don't you guys see the similarity between this and my theory of the universe as a big intelligent resonator?
[ |
I see it more as a dynamic complex concerto of all kinds of resonances, which mathematically and logically always totals in 1 stable bounded groundform, 1 whole.
It depends how you look at it. (see "1"(a boundary) and/or "all" ( the (fractal) divisions)).
You can treat divisions as you like, the result will be "the same": logically limited by that boudnary.
I see the "intelligence" strictly as physical laws:
The "function" that makes that the complexity (the concerto) i described, always results in 1)
/e:with fractal divisions i mean: "brains in the brains in the brains in the brains..."
|
I used to think that the universe was totally harmonic, like 0 = 0 etc. as there is no other way, now, is it? But I started to let the disharmony in my thinking take a little part. I mean, the only harmonic thing that can exist is the non-existence, without any dynamics, relationships, grouping etc. Been thinking about this for some time now.
EDIT: In a sense, the universal harmony is the harmony and disharmony, which bring dynamics and order in the universe itself. Chaos theory and string theory support this, and quantum mechanics too. |
well yeah the universe must have an extra element that keeps preventing it from : 0 = 0
i mean , like with the bigbang : the moment itself it was 0 = 0 , and it needed a 'push' to start the whole thing (i also believe before the bigbang there was allready something that ended in a big bang)
like a cycle
|
|
31-07-2009 18:47 |
|
|
Saikonutta
not helpful ^^
Registration Date: 09-11-2006
Posts: 275
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
meh,
it didn't need a push imo, it's just the loop starting again (like everything else, a dynamic characteristic of everything) (no energy gets lost or gets added!!
)
Just a different fractal scale, or our global boundary which provided every possibilty, reboots, oscillates, wotever
The same paths can make different results now.
If you throw sand on the ground, it will never land exactly the same twice, same with the "big bang":
we just enter a new fractal scale/dimension; same rules, but another scale.
It makes loads of noise when that happens i guess (lol) , but i think we shouldn't see the Big Bang as a cause, but try to find a general principle of division, see the pattern or structure of those "dynamics" (universes that get "born and die")
This post has been edited 2 time(s), it was last edited by Saikonutta: 31-07-2009 19:16.
|
|
31-07-2009 19:13 |
|
|
Muad'Dib
Andrejnalin
Registration Date: 02-12-2003
Posts: 4,197
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Greyone
quote: |
Originally posted by Muad'Dib
quote: |
Originally posted by Saikonutta
quote: |
Don't you guys see the similarity between this and my theory of the universe as a big intelligent resonator?
[ |
I see it more as a dynamic complex concerto of all kinds of resonances, which mathematically and logically always totals in 1 stable bounded groundform, 1 whole.
It depends how you look at it. (see "1"(a boundary) and/or "all" ( the (fractal) divisions)).
You can treat divisions as you like, the result will be "the same": logically limited by that boudnary.
I see the "intelligence" strictly as physical laws:
The "function" that makes that the complexity (the concerto) i described, always results in 1)
/e:with fractal divisions i mean: "brains in the brains in the brains in the brains..."
|
I used to think that the universe was totally harmonic, like 0 = 0 etc. as there is no other way, now, is it? But I started to let the disharmony in my thinking take a little part. I mean, the only harmonic thing that can exist is the non-existence, without any dynamics, relationships, grouping etc. Been thinking about this for some time now.
EDIT: In a sense, the universal harmony is the harmony and disharmony, which bring dynamics and order in the universe itself. Chaos theory and string theory support this, and quantum mechanics too. |
well yeah the universe must have an extra element that keeps preventing it from : 0 = 0
i mean , like with the bigbang : the moment itself it was 0 = 0 , and it needed a 'push' to start the whole thing (i also believe before the bigbang there was allready something that ended in a big bang)
like a cycle |
Thinking about that possibility, too. That 'thing' is within the universal harmony, of course.
__ Thinking about becoming an Image-Line/FL Studio customer? Want a 10% reduction in price? Use this affiliate link:
http://affiliate.image-line.com/BADEBDG473
There is no such thing without its opposite
-Bene Gesserit
|
|
31-07-2009 19:21 |
|
|
Greyone
Master Producer
Registration Date: 01-04-2005
Posts: 6,285
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Saikonutta
meh,
it didn't need a push imo, it's just the loop starting again (like everything else, a dynamic characteristic of everything) (no energy gets lost or gets added!!
)
Just a different fractal scale, or our global boundary which provided every possibilty, reboots, oscillates, wotever
The same paths can make different results now.
If you throw sand on the ground, it will never land exactly the same twice, same with the "big bang":
we just enter a new fractal scale/dimension; same rules, but another scale.
It makes loads of noise when that happens i guess (lol) , but i think we shouldn't see the Big Bang as a cause, but try to find a general principle of division, see the pattern or structure of those "dynamics" (universes that get "born and die") |
true , also because time is continuous , maybe there isnt a beginning lol
its just looping universes (like a sinus : ... - 0 -max - 0 - min - 0 - ...)
|
|
31-07-2009 19:31 |
|
|
Greyone
Master Producer
Registration Date: 01-04-2005
Posts: 6,285
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
so the conclusion is:
enjoy your life
|
|
31-07-2009 21:20 |
|
|
Saikonutta
not helpful ^^
Registration Date: 09-11-2006
Posts: 275
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
|
31-07-2009 21:27 |
|
|
Muad'Dib
Andrejnalin
Registration Date: 02-12-2003
Posts: 4,197
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
quote: |
Originally posted by Saikonutta
Well, when you talk about such big scales, time is irrelevant, because time is simply a manifest of the pattern.
the only pâttern/continuity there is, is "1" or "unit" imo (in that scale) (in fact ground form or boundary) |
Yup. That's why I concur with your opinion that says: know the quantum world and know the whole world.
__ Thinking about becoming an Image-Line/FL Studio customer? Want a 10% reduction in price? Use this affiliate link:
http://affiliate.image-line.com/BADEBDG473
There is no such thing without its opposite
-Bene Gesserit
|
|
01-08-2009 04:14 |
|
|
Muad'Dib
Andrejnalin
Registration Date: 02-12-2003
Posts: 4,197
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
Oh, yeah,
__ Thinking about becoming an Image-Line/FL Studio customer? Want a 10% reduction in price? Use this affiliate link:
http://affiliate.image-line.com/BADEBDG473
There is no such thing without its opposite
-Bene Gesserit
|
|
01-08-2009 04:14 |
|
|
selig
Steppa
Registration Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 159
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
I don't believe the big bang happened, it's just creationism masquerading as science imo. To believe in it one has to have faith in more supernatural forces than most religions, and it makes about as much sense as them too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4Pme3XL1AA
|
|
01-08-2009 23:09 |
|
|
Saikonutta
not helpful ^^
Registration Date: 09-11-2006
Posts: 275
Helpfulness rating:
|
|
ok, i'm not able to proof there was a big bang,
(i'm not a physicist)
And does it in fact matter if it was a Big Bang or a Tiny Glitch or even an implosion?
What matters imo is the dynamic of it, the sequence:
Like galaxies taht come & go, solar systems, weather, tides...
All these natural phenomena seem to follow some kind of embedded function, some kind of sinewave...
What i think is our common quantum 'blob' is no exception in that statement...
And I don't see the connection with creationism either, I see just that "simple" 'universal' dynamic.
|
|
02-08-2009 11:21 |
|
|
|