drumnbass.be forum

drumnbass.be forum » Production » Software » Cubase LE vs Sonar LE/ Emu 1616 M
Go to the bottom of this page Cubase LE vs Sonar LE/ Emu 1616 M
Author
Post
tetsuo tetsuo is a male
Guiness factory


Registration Date: 26-12-2004
Posts: 678

Helpfulness rating: 
3 Vote(s) - Average Rating: 7.67

Hi peepz.

Just got my hand on a Emu 1616 M. Huge improvment on soud quality!!
Anyway, got a few software with it and I need your pov on a few things:

I used reason for some time, but I want to switch to a better sequencer and vst/i capable software.

What do you guys think of cakewalk sonar LE? Is it a bit "easier" to use than the almighty cubase LE?

I will probably use the very good proteus x that came with my card, and both soft are compatible with it.

I just need to know what you guys think.

Btw, I recommend that filthy Emu 1616 M!! I consider it as my first piece of harware as the effect are HW accelerated, really cool to unload cpu. And the proteus x sound bank is just magic!!

ez Drummer

__
Yesterday' s futur is today!! Doped
07-05-2007 15:34
Paracyte Paracyte is a male
Crazy Bouncin Sinusoid


images/avatars/avatar-2331.jpg

Registration Date: 07-12-2006
Posts: 1,015

Helpfulness rating: 
1 Vote(s) - Average Rating: 10.00

I will say go for Cubase sx.Still think Cubase is more friendly then Sonar.My opinion.

__
My Soundcloud
08-05-2007 01:52
tetsuo tetsuo is a male
Guiness factory


Registration Date: 26-12-2004
Posts: 678

Helpfulness rating: 
3 Vote(s) - Average Rating: 7.67

ok, that what I am thinking... Specially since I can't manage to have a single sound out of sonar...

I think there are both good, just a matter of opinion I guess

__
Yesterday' s futur is today!! Doped
08-05-2007 11:25
drumnbass.be forum » Production » Software » Cubase LE vs Sonar LE/ Emu 1616 M